Lev Seidman vs Marco Furlanetto Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 20 Aug at 01:19 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Seidman vs M. Furlanetto

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Seidman 1 - 0 Furlanetto
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lev Seidman winning 2 and Marco Furlanetto winning 0. The last match between Lev Seidman and Marco Furlanetto was at the M15 Arad, 20-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Lev Seidman getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Seidman | 1 |
| Furlanetto | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Arad(08-20-25)
L. Seidman vs M. Furlanetto H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.14% (16-12) | Career Total W/L | 60.42% (87-57) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Seidman vs M. Furlanetto Match Preview:
- Who has better recent second serve performance? Seidman, winning 44.12% of points compared to Furlanetto's 41.06%.
- In return games, Seidman has a slight edge on second serves, winning 51.26% of points over Furlanetto's 50.49%.
- On first serve returns, Furlanetto leads with 33.22%, a small margin over Seidman's 32.39%.
- Furlanetto has performed better under pressure, saving 53.23% of breakpoints versus Seidman's 47.62%.
- In overall match performance, Furlanetto has a marginally better win rate over the past year (61.76% to Seidman's 60%).
- Both players excel on clay; however, Furlanetto holds a better win rate of 61% compared to Seidman's 57%.
- Seidman faces stronger opponents on average, with an opponent rank of 53.73, whereas Furlanetto's opponents average a rank of 136.09.
- In deciding sets, Furlanetto has a significant advantage, winning 57% compared to Seidman's 20%.
- Seidman is more efficient in converting break points, with a conversion rate of 46.43% against Furlanetto's 32.95%.
Editorial Prediction (August 20, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating the recent performance stats, both Seidman and Furlanetto show particular strengths and areas of advantage. Seidman's superior second serve and breakpoint conversion rates indicate a solid advantage in key match moments.
Furlanetto, on the other hand, excels in saving breakpoints and clinching deciding sets, suggesting strong mental fortitude and resilience under pressure. These areas might turn the contest in Furlanetto's favor if the match remains tightly contested.
Seidman's experience against higher-ranked opponents could provide them with increased readiness for tough match-ups, but Furlanetto's consistent win rate on clay and overall comparison against moderately ranked opponents suggest otherwise.
Taking into account these performance nuances and open-surface preferences, Furlanetto seems most likely to edge out as the winner in this matchup.
Lev Seidman vs Marco Furlanetto Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Seidman vs M. Furlanetto H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:3:13 | Average Match Time | 2:3:13 |
| 74% (54/73) | 1st Serve % | 65% (39/60) |
| 61% (33/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (24/39) |
| 53% (10/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 33% (7/21) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 30% (3/10) |
| 48% (29/60) | Return Points Win % | 41% (30/73) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Seidman Recent Matches Played
M. Furlanetto Recent Matches Played

L. Seidman vs M. Furlanetto Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.14% (16/12) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.42% (87/57) |
| 58.46% (38/27) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.06% (191/127) |
| 53.54% (340/295) | Games Win/Loss | 55.05% (1645/1343) |
| 61.11% (11/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.56% (10/8) |
| 50.00% (5/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.11% (77/49) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 11 | Aces Total | 72 |
| 0.08 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 26 | Total Double Faults | 278 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 23.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 225.74 |
| 67% (469/705) | 1st Serve % | 64% (2737/4294) |
| 57% (269/469) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (1723/2737) |
| 44% (104/236) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (656/1557) |
| 53% (37/70) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (210/499) |
| 42% (279/670) | Return Points Win % | 43% (1894/4414) |
| 57.14% (16/12) | Futures W/L | 60.42% (87/57) |
| 57% (16/28) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (85/142) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 67% (2/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 68% (19/28) |
| 33% (3/9) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (12/30) |
| 88% (16/14) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (88/79) |
| 13% (16/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (88/9) |
| 17% (12/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (56/8) |